WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

800

How in the hell has no one taken this point to public forum? If it is strictly therapeutic, then 1) it is definitively not a vaccine and should never be defined as one and 2) all tax dollars spent on registries and coercion is an egregious and fraudelent waste!

How in the hell has no one taken this point to public forum? If it is strictly therapeutic, then 1) it is definitively not a vaccine and should never be defined as one and 2) all tax dollars spent on registries and coercion is an egregious and fraudelent waste!

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Vaccines don’t really prevent infection completely, they prevent disease— a clinical case of a viral illness

Good point, thanks.

[–] 1 pt

Most vaccines up until now have been of the innoculating kind which prevent infection. But now shills and MSM are trying to make you forget that, and say that vaccines have always been about reducing the symptoms of the illness.

[–] 1 pt (edited )

reducing the symptoms of the illness

I mean. They aren't wrong. Total and complete immunity from a pathogen is a reduction in symptoms. ... :) Just smile. It helps.

e; This is not to say these 3 mRNA bio-weapon shots cause either of the outcomes talked about. The outcome they cause is death by way of debilitation.