WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

PCR test is cheaper than a lung scan and quite a bit more convenient. PCR isn’t a tru case as defined as clinical disease. Its a test for presence of the virus alive or dead. And it has an error rate. They sold it as a metric for “cases” in the clinical sense. That doesn’t mean the disease is imaginary or harmless.

liberals are misinterpreting the data so the data isn’t real

No. Im sorry. I don’t accept that. You want that to be true. But it isn’t.

[–] 0 pt

You keep defending the use of pcr, which cannot be used for that.

Its a test for presence of the virus alive or dead

You lack familiarity with current scientific theories. Viruses are never considered to be alive, since they lack the thermodynamic properties of life forms.

[–] 0 pt

Im defending it as a diagnostic tool, for which it is very useful if it is interpreted correctly. I am defending it as a metric for infection rates, for which it is very useful if it is interpreted correctly. You can use pcr for those things. I don’t care what Mullis says in some fucking youtube video. Knowing whether the viral RNA of SARS CoV 2 is in your nose is useful if you want to know whether you have a covid infection. Of course it is. Don’t you have any sense in your head?

Hey wheels were meant to be used with a horse and cart! You can’t put them on an automobile.

I mean, just fucking listen to yourself.

You lack familiarity with current scientific theories.

I don’t think so.

Viruses are never considered to be alive,

Scientism. This distinction is a pile of biological semantics. Lots of scientists consider them alive but it doesn’t have anything to do with your faggoty theory. They are what they are. They eat and multiply.

[–] 0 pt

I don’t care what Mullis says in some fucking youtube video.

He's got the Nobel Prize and he invented the PCR test.

But you are so much better than him that you don't care what he says. OK, whatever.

Scientism. This distinction is a pile of biological semantics. Lots of scientists consider them alive but it doesn’t have anything to do with your faggoty theory. They are what they are. They eat and multiply.

You seem to be confusing a virus with a bacteria. Viruses cannot multiply, and they certainly do not 'eat' either.

If you study hard maybe you can pass high school someday.

I agree for the most part with you, obviously you are well founded with the laboratory system.

Yes, it’s real and was intentional to end Trump's resurrection of America. Unfortunately it is possible that the jumps in deaths was due to isolation and hopeless people facing government choices to end their jobs and daily routines. I witnessed this first hand.

Also, where are the flu deaths? Every year we have pneumonia/flu deaths until Covid. How convenient.

[–] 1 pt

I dont think its terribly implausible that influenza cases went down 90 or 95 % for a year. If you look at the way flu spreads every season, it is a sort of stochastic process in which it hits 2 or 3 regions in the country where herd immunity is low to newer strains. All the deaths are in those regions every year. They are not diffuse. Every region gets hit every 8 or 10 year when immunity drops locally to the rapidly mutating flu viruses. So could a minor behavioral change result in essentially no flu in any region for one year? I think it could. If you could reduce the R0 of flu by 10% with obsessive hand washing and masks and people decided not to just go to work sick because they thought they might be spreading covid, it might prevent an outbreak in any particular region for a year or two. Eventually the virus would mutate to become more contagious or people’s immunities would go down sufficiently for the R0 to reach >= 1.

Also almost every old person with a fever is being given zithromax or doxycycline or some antiviral this year. They are demanding it. It could represent a real change in number of flu cases/deaths.

Realize that most flu deaths are uneccessary since flu is easily treated with antivirals. People dont know that. There’s a cure for flu and cold. There are dozens of drugs that work on those viruses.

Maybe they are hiding the typical 10 to 20,000 flu deaths that we typically see in a year by recategorizing them as covid. That is a drop in the bucket compared to the massive excess deaths we have seen in the last year. Weve had a 500,000 death increase just in 2020 alone. And people didn’t start dying until April.

This is some CIA psyop or something that has everybody on this site convinced that nobody really died of covid. A huge number of old people died of covid. Most of them had several years of life left which they deserved. It was really bad, alot of old people died horribly.

Accepting that fact does not mean you have to take the vaccine or support lockdowns and facemasks. There are antiviral prophylactics that could have been used safely since the start of this entire affair. And don’t forget the NIH funded the creation of this virus.