![Vaccine Paradox [725x495 - 68KB]](https://pic8.co/sh/vJ8oyn.jpg){kind=link}
There are no covid-specific symptoms
Anosmia, ground glass lung scans, high D-dimer values/ severe clotting.
Problem is that the test doesn't work. They control the number of 'positives' by changing the cycles of amplifications of the PCR test.
They control the number of false positives by canging the cycles of amplification. At 30 cycles or less >80% of the swabs that test positive can be cultured for sars cov 2
There was also no change in the death rate.
False. The death rate increased by 20%. 2019 US deaths- 2.8 million. 2020 US deaths - 3.4 million
20%. 2019 US deaths- 2.8 million. 2020 US deaths - 3.4 million
Even if real, 20% is just not significant. People who already had 1 foot in the grave could have died a little bit quicker for any number of reasons. Most notably less access to medical care because hospitals were reserving beds for the non-existing 'pandemic', people were afraid to go to the doctor because they might be contaminated and so on. Also, obesity increased dramatically since the beginning of the pandemic, which may have caused excess deaths as well. Suicides due to people losing their livelihoods during the lockdowns and so on.
In fact, once you add up all the excess deaths, 20% seems low.
2014: 2,626,418 2015: 2,712,630 : Increase - 86,212 - 3.28% 2016 : 2,744,248 : Increase - 31,618 - 1.16% 2017 : 2,813,503 : Increase - 69,255 - 2.52% 2018 : 2,839,206 : Increase - 25,703 - 1% 2019: 2,855,000 : Increase - 15,794- 0.55% 2020: 3,358,814 : Increase - 503,814 - 14.99%
Theyve never had an increase this high in a single year since they began using this system. And the epidemic didnt start till April ffs
There was never in recent history such decreased access to medical care and such dramatic social changes.
With no lockdown, Sweden had a death rate increase of 7.7%. The lockdown killed more people than the disease would have.
The state takes the crown for the most destructive force to human life. It always has.
China had a lockdown and they had less cases than sweden.
Its almost as if the lockdowns and masks were one of many factors that had an impact on covid deaths and not a sole determiner of death rate.
The lockdowns, while of limited usefulness epidemiologically and harmful economically did not kill a significant number of people, except maybe in nursing homes. But that was sort of a different problem.
Covid disproportionately attacks people with R Y-chromosomal type. Sweden is only ~20% R haplogroup. There may be other reasons like population density or how much cod they eat.
Its retarded leftist thinking to belief that the virus respects some piece of paper signed by a politician. People still have to leave the house.
They control the number of false positives by canging the cycles of amplification. At 30 cycles or less >80% of the swabs that test positive can be cultured for sars cov 2
But PCR is not a test. It can't be used to prove an infection. You try to defend it, but Kary Mullins, who created the test, and understood it talked about it clearly that it is not something that can be used for that purpose.
But PCR is not a test. It can't be used to prove an infection
Yeah it is a test. Of course its a test. Dont be stupid. Its a test for the presence of SARS Cov 2 RNA.
Kary Mullins
Oh gosh Im thrilled you brought up that chestnut
https://poal.co/s/Science/378039/f689514d-bcfd-4fae-8cff-ca56c14e7e7b
You have no understanding about science. You can't even distinguish between a virus and a bacteria.
You either are some political activist or some uneducated discount budget shill.
Your opinions on this topic are less than worthless.
Explain for the class how a PCR test works.
Anosmia, ground glass lung scans, high D-dimer values/ severe clotting.
If these are real, why is the diagnosis based on the PCR test, and not on this?
PCR test is cheaper than a lung scan and quite a bit more convenient. PCR isn’t a tru case as defined as clinical disease. Its a test for presence of the virus alive or dead. And it has an error rate. They sold it as a metric for “cases” in the clinical sense. That doesn’t mean the disease is imaginary or harmless.
liberals are misinterpreting the data so the data isn’t real
No. Im sorry. I don’t accept that. You want that to be true. But it isn’t.
You keep defending the use of pcr, which cannot be used for that.
Its a test for presence of the virus alive or dead
You lack familiarity with current scientific theories. Viruses are never considered to be alive, since they lack the thermodynamic properties of life forms.
I agree for the most part with you, obviously you are well founded with the laboratory system.
Yes, it’s real and was intentional to end Trump's resurrection of America. Unfortunately it is possible that the jumps in deaths was due to isolation and hopeless people facing government choices to end their jobs and daily routines. I witnessed this first hand.
Also, where are the flu deaths? Every year we have pneumonia/flu deaths until Covid. How convenient.
Were the deaths from covid, or was it the state being the greatest destroyer of life as usual?
The state created covid. Covid killed people. The state badgered everyone in to getting the vax. That killed more. Does that clear it up?
As long as you acknowledge the hand the state played in this.
(post is archived)