The government cannot allow individuals, who do not want to get vaccinated, to risk lives of those who are already vaccinated
I fail to understand how non vaccinated people are a risk to vaccinated people.
The measure is designed to counter “negative propaganda” about the jab
The effect will be quite the opposite as people know coercion is because there is something wrong with the jab. If it were safe, coercion would not be required.
>The government cannot allow individuals, who do not want to get vaccinated, to risk lives of those who are already vaccinated
I fail to understand how non vaccinated people are a risk to vaccinated people.
>The measure is designed to counter “negative propaganda” about the jab
The effect will be quite the opposite as people know coercion is because there is something wrong with the jab. If it were safe, coercion would not be required.
According to last year's Canadian government leak, all the governments had to formulate ways of coercing the population to get euthanized. This might be Pakistans way. It seems in Pakistan (((they))) are having an uphill climb with only of the population having taken the kill shot.
According to last year's Canadian government leak, all the governments had to formulate ways of coercing the population to get euthanized. This might be Pakistans way. It seems in Pakistan (((they))) are having an uphill climb with only [3.3%](https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/coronavirus-data-explorer?zoomToSelection=true&pickerSort=desc&pickerMetric=total_vaccinations&Metric=People+vaccinated&Interval=Cumulative&Relative+to+Population=true&Align+outbreaks=false&country=CAN~DEU~IND~ISR~GBR~USA~PAK) of the population having taken the kill shot.
(post is archived)