WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2026 Poal.co

109

Source (thenewamerican.com)

TL;DR: No. It does not.

In reality, however, it was “lawfully created” even if one accepts only the premises of pre-Western, pre-Christian civilization. Just consider what Professor Thomas Sowell pointed out regarding this in 2003:

One of the things we take for granted today is that it is wrong to take other people’s land by force. Neither American Indians nor the European invaders believed that.

Both took other people’s land by force — as did Asians, Africans and others. The Indians no doubt regretted losing so many battles. But that is wholly different from saying that they thought battles were the wrong way to settle ownership of land.

For this reason, tribes often fought with each other over land and resources. Not surprisingly, too, they didn’t view other Indians as the “noble savages” some white liberals later romanticized them as. For instance, consider that the tribal name “Sioux” is a derogatory term meaning “little snakes.”

Oh, and the name was given to them by other Indians: the Ojibwe/Chippewa tribe.

[Source](https://thenewamerican.com/us/culture/does-america-sit-on-stolen-land/) TL;DR: No. It does not. > In reality, however, it was “lawfully created” even if one accepts only the premises of pre-Western, pre-Christian civilization. Just consider what Professor Thomas Sowell pointed out regarding this in 2003: >> One of the things we take for granted today is that it is wrong to take other people’s land by force. Neither American Indians nor the European invaders believed that. > Both took other people’s land by force — as did Asians, Africans and others. The Indians no doubt regretted losing so many battles. But that is wholly different from saying that they thought battles were the wrong way to settle ownership of land. > For this reason, tribes often fought with each other over land and resources. Not surprisingly, too, they didn’t view other Indians as the “noble savages” some white liberals later romanticized them as. For instance, consider that the tribal name “Sioux” is a derogatory term meaning “little snakes.” > Oh, and the name was given to them by other Indians: the Ojibwe/Chippewa tribe.
[–] 1 pt

The land was possessed by someone before any of us.

But ownership, or distribution of ownership be conquering is a thing.

As I formulate the thought, if you fail to fight to keep your land, if by blood if need, I realize as an American we have already lost all we fought for. And I don’t see fighting as collective solution in our dna any more.

Sad to have that realization.

Let me take another black pill.

[–] 0 pt

You’re wrong.

The kikes are overplaying their hand, and they forgot what Whites can do when cornered.

Germans didn’t suddenly decide to round them up and expel them, just like these well poisoning coin clipping sewer pedojew rats have been expelled from hundreds countries, over a thousand times, in the past two millennia.

[–] 0 pt

My focus was on feather niggers. Wasn’t thinking globally.