Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

366

Rewind about 40 years to what it was and maybe it would be worth existing.

Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/02/03/hegseth-boy-scouts-scouting-america/

From the post:

>The Pentagon issued a warning late Monday to Scouting America, formerly known as the Boy Scouts, saying the organization risks losing its long-standing partnership with the U.S. military unless it rapidly implements “core value reforms.”

Rewind about 40 years to what it was and maybe it would be worth existing. Source: https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2026/02/03/hegseth-boy-scouts-scouting-america/ From the post: >>The Pentagon issued a warning late Monday to Scouting America, formerly known as the Boy Scouts, saying the organization risks losing its long-standing partnership with the U.S. military unless it rapidly implements “core value reforms.”
You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (6).
[–] • 1 pt

There needs to be a new Scouts, that in addition to teaching boys to become proper men, it drills down in the constitution, word for word, and teaches the next generation of men what are our God given rights and how to defend them.

[–] • 1 pt

"Future Men of America" or something. I don't know. I make shit up as I go. It should be a structure designed intentionally and ONLY for boys/men to help them be better men and to grow up to be strong men. Simple as that.

No more feminizing of men. Built in provisions that if a court order forces them to allow girls/women the entire organization immediately stops existing and is reformed under a new name with the same rules.

It can re-form hundreds of times a year if needed, while lawsuits from every "broken" branch still exist to attack those that are trying to make it impossible to have spaces for men.