WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2024 Poal.co

150
[–] 3 pts

In Idaho at least it was just dross. It was already illegal for non-citizens to vote. The amendment just re-stated that in a different way. It's a good thing for sure, but it didn't produce any functional change.

[–] 1 pt

I think most states were like that. Additionally, “it’s illegal for them to vote at the federal level.” That doesn’t mean it was enforced…no more do the new amendments. What they could possibly used for, however, is a forcing function for tighter processes and procedures.