I disagree. Dems playbook is very easy to read. Newsom, while checking a lot of boxes, is missing three key. He's not colored. He's not a woman. He's not under the LGBT umbrella. Dems aren't stupid, and will ignore the third (for now). AOC is dumb, but she's a staunch commie, and falls in line easily with Dem talking points, checks the diversity points, and has a STRONG base amoung women and liberals. In addition, she also fills the roll of "young", being 43 when the next election takes place.
She's dumb as a bag of hammers. AOC is too hard to coach and isn't smart enough to sell the lies. She also lacks broad appeal.
They'll groom the scumbag psychopaths newsom and whitmer. They'll also float some new dem sociopaths, gays, niggers, and women of course.
I think newsom has submitted to blackmail being a pedo, sucking dick, killing someone in a ritual, etc. The problem the dims have IS the broad appeal. Every single candidate right now they have is so unlikeable. Dims have had the popular vote for 30+ years and the stupid multiple much faster than people with intelligence, which is why DIMs don't care about broad appeal. In that scenario, is correct about AOC in 2028.
I can definitely see what you're saying. But AOC is so god damn STUPID. She would need the same level of minders that Kammy would need.
I think the misconception people have is intelligence is akin to ability to be in office. I disagree on that and argue that the DUMBER a person is, the easier they are to place into a position. BOTH parties want people who can be controlled as figure heads. Critical thinking hampers this. Even Trump suffers from this. A lot of Poal'rs are probably to young to understand this reference, but if you ever wondered what a Dan Quayle run/presidency would have been like, we're about to find out.
(post is archived)