Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

The Supreme Court has been very good about gun rights of late, but the Rahimi decision is anything but an example of that.

While most people aren't upset that domestic abusers can't have firearms, there are issues with looking at Rahimi this way. There are a lot of issues with the decision as it stands.

[Source.](https://bearingarms.com/tomknighton/2024/06/24/something-roberts-got-very-wrong-in-rahimi-decision-n1225364) > The Supreme Court has been very good about gun rights of late, but the Rahimi decision is anything but an example of that. > While most people aren't upset that domestic abusers can't have firearms, there are issues with looking at Rahimi this way. There are a lot of issues with the decision as it stands.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (4).
[–] • 1 pt

Yeah, this is a bad, bad, decision. Besides, any motivated criminal will find another way. I posted this the last time someone posted this story.

Will they take away all of their knives? All of their tools like crowbars? How about their car? Every one of these could be used by an abuser as a weapon. Hell, the car will transport them to the accuser and can be used as a weapon. Why not take that away first?

[–] • 1 pt

Will they take away all of their knives? All of their tools like crowbars? How about their car? Every one of these could be used by an abuser as a weapon. Hell, the car will transport them to the accuser and can be used as a weapon. Why not take that away first?

Because it's all about the guns, and getting people used to the idea that the government has the 'right' to take them from you.