WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K
[Archive](https://archive.today/COavU)

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

This trial is supposed to be about an alleged "unreported campaign expense" for an NDA to a prostitute. The details of the tryst have NO BEARING on the case and should not have been questioned at all, except for the smirking assholes that enjoy humiliating Trump because orange man bad. If that corrupt judge wants to hear details about Donald's dick, he should pay the slut for a private session in his chambers. He allowed Stormy Daniels to be questioned about the color of Trump's underwear, as if that were relevant, but wouldn't allow the defense to enter the dismissal of federal charges relating directly to the payment at the core of this fake crime. Why didn't the defense ask her about the rank odor that filled the hotel room when she stripped naked for him? Or how far from her vaginal opening her labia minora hangs? That has about much relevancy as any part of her testimony. This is just a kangaroo court run by niggers. "Expect a wild ride when you put a monkey behind the wheel."

[–] 0 pt

And there doesn't appear to be a damn thing we can do about it legally .