To justify regulations, governments must show that each regulation “is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation,” the high court said at the time. “Only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s ‘unqualified command.’
“Lifetime disarmament of an individual based on alienage or nationality alone does not have roots in the history and tradition of the United States,” Mr. Carbajal-Flores’ lawyers argued.
[Source.](https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2024/03/19/federal-judge-rules-illegal-immigrant-has-right-to-bear-arms-n2636675)
>
To justify regulations, governments must show that each regulation “is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation,” the high court said at the time. “Only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s ‘unqualified command.’
>
“Lifetime disarmament of an individual based on alienage or nationality alone does not have roots in the history and tradition of the United States,” Mr. Carbajal-Flores’ lawyers argued.
(post is archived)