Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

271

To justify regulations, governments must show that each regulation “is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation,” the high court said at the time. “Only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s ‘unqualified command.’

“Lifetime disarmament of an individual based on alienage or nationality alone does not have roots in the history and tradition of the United States,” Mr. Carbajal-Flores’ lawyers argued.

[Source.](https://townhall.com/tipsheet/leahbarkoukis/2024/03/19/federal-judge-rules-illegal-immigrant-has-right-to-bear-arms-n2636675) > To justify regulations, governments must show that each regulation “is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition of firearms regulation,” the high court said at the time. “Only if a firearm regulation is consistent with this nation’s historical tradition may a court conclude that the individual’s conduct falls outside the Second Amendment’s ‘unqualified command.’ > “Lifetime disarmament of an individual based on alienage or nationality alone does not have roots in the history and tradition of the United States,” Mr. Carbajal-Flores’ lawyers argued.

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

Incremental tyranny, here we are.

[–] • 2 pts

As pointed out,

[–] • 3 pts

I hope Trump took something good as his personal records like reports on how Obama's not a natural born citizen, and stuff about Biden and Clintons.

[–] • 2 pts

I hope Trump took something good as his personal records like reports on how Obama's not a natural born citizen, and stuff about Biden and Clintons.

That would be hysterical. Big Mike Obama is quaking in his boots right now.

[–] • 3 pts

Excellent plan, you get people to agree that some people aren't allowed to own any guns. Later, it becomes no one is allowed to own any guns.

Of course, the real problem isn't guns, but criminals entering the country.

[–] • 1 pt

Of course, the real problem isn't guns, but criminals entering the country.

And niggers.

[–] • 2 pts

So a 'judge' decided that EVERY human on Earth has the rights of the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights? Make him answer this, 'IF the obvious Illegal invaders were ....RUSSIAN, would they still have OUR Rights'?