WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Some experts believe the court’s opinion headed off that possibility by requiring Congress to first enact enforcement legislation spelling out the process for disqualifying a candidate – a requirement that would almost certainly be unattainable. (That portion of the opinion, however, only garnered the support of five justices.) It appears the court is limiting how Congress goes about enforcing Section 3 through legislation, which may also limit Congress if it attempts to refuse to count electoral votes.

>Some experts believe the court’s opinion headed off that possibility by requiring Congress to first enact enforcement legislation spelling out the process for disqualifying a candidate – a requirement that would almost certainly be unattainable. (That portion of the opinion, however, only garnered the support of five justices.) It appears the court is limiting how Congress goes about enforcing Section 3 through legislation, which may also limit Congress if it attempts to refuse to count electoral votes. [Archive](https://archive.today/TaV1S)

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

The more they're scared of Trump and pulling all kinds of dirty tricks, the more I want Trump to win.

Impeachment failed. Legislating that 'citizen Trump' is guilty of a crime of insurrection sounds like something not permissible in our Republic.