tl;dr -- States don't get to decide who is disqualified as an insurrectionist. The end, unanimous decision.
tl;dr -- States don't get to decide who is disqualified as an insurrectionist. The end, unanimous decision.
As expected. Now watch Dems throw more animus at SCOTUS, like clockwork.
As expected. Now watch Dems throw more animus at SCOTUS, like clockwork.
He was accused a citing an insurrection, not convicted. That is a critical distinction they didn't even consider when making this ruling, and there must be some other J6 issues they wanted to avoid.
He was accused a citing an insurrection, not convicted. That is a critical distinction they didn't even consider when making this ruling, and there must be some other J6 issues they wanted to avoid.
They had no choice. They were either a Constitutional supreme court or they weren't. It was that cut and dry.
Congress, not the States, is "responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates."
They had no choice. They were either a Constitutional supreme court or they weren't. It was that cut and dry.
> Congress, not the States, is "responsible for enforcing Section 3 against federal officeholders and candidates."
This just takes way their "super easy" button. They still have their "easy" buttons with dead people voting, miscounts, voting machine "glitches", and so on.
This just takes way their "super easy" button. They still have their "easy" buttons with dead people voting, miscounts, voting machine "glitches", and so on.
(post is archived)