WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.4K

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

Your honor, the plantifs need to show proof that climate change exists. Just because they claim it, doesn't make it so.

[–] 2 pts

they have fraudulent charts and graphs and 'expert witnesses' paid to come testify that climate change is indeed real, what more do you need?

[–] 0 pt

As long as past predictions do not happen, they need to be dismissed as snake ol salesmen.

[–] 1 pt

Proof, lol. So many tricks to bypass burden of proof requirement. A popular one is called "judicial notice".

In October 1981, Judge Thomas Johnson made an announcement. After deliberation, he had accepted a fact into judicial notice—a legal term for a fact accepted in a court as true without the need to produce evidence. The Holocaust, said Johnson, was an indisputable fact. https://archive.is/O1yEJ

All you need is a single judge willing to be complicit in your scheme.

[–] 1 pt

It's as if jews run the courts.