That was determined in a previous appellate court case, but this judge won't acknowledge their decision.
Trump discusses this in his speech ...
Ahhh, that's not the impression given by the headline that you wrote. You have a habit of doing this sort of thing. It's misleading.
You and I are on the same side. The facts of the matter are sufficient to back up our view. There is no need to sensationalize it or try to mislead people.
The whole title was a chop up from the original, and I only cut the front part because it was a livestream and said "Live" and other crap. The rest of the title is as it was. I just noticed it's botched with the extra word "is" after Trump. I was screwing around with trying to get the preset right on the video ... do you know how many seconds are 5hr 18min and 49 seconds?
I never intend to mislead anyone, but typos do occasionally escape me. Regardless, in this case, Trump explains the appellate court findings and that this Judge ignoring their ruling multiple times in the video. Yrump says he should be disbarred.
He probably should be, but wont.
But, no, I don't know how many seconds that is.
(post is archived)