An impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden would force the National Archives (NARA) to disclose the president’s communications sent through his email address aliases, constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley recently explained.
Turley, who supports an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden, wrote in a Hill op-ed that records from Biden’s email aliases will likely remain hidden from the public unless House Republicans open an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden.
Under the Presidential Records Act (PRA), former President Barack Obama and Joe Biden have 30 days to block the release of the emails. House Republicans demanded NARA release the records on August 17. The agency replied on Thursday by noting Biden and Obama must approve the request, something Turley pointed out they could “easily” do.
He wrote that if there are “innocent explanations” for Biden’s using an alias, being open and allowing Congress to view the emails will make that clear, but “given the other evidence of corruption and influence peddling, it seems obvious that the information must be reviewed.”
[Source.](https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/09/05/jonathan-turley-impeachment-inquiry-would-force-disclosure-bidens-alias-emails/)
>
An impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden would force the National Archives (NARA) to disclose the president’s communications sent through his email address aliases, constitutional scholar Jonathan Turley recently explained.
>
Turley, who supports an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden, wrote in a Hill op-ed that records from Biden’s email aliases will likely remain hidden from the public unless House Republicans open an impeachment inquiry into Joe Biden.
>
Under the Presidential Records Act (PRA), former President Barack Obama and Joe Biden have 30 days to block the release of the emails. House Republicans demanded NARA release the records on August 17. The agency replied on Thursday by noting Biden and Obama must approve the request, something Turley pointed out they could “easily” do.
>
He wrote that if there are “innocent explanations” for Biden’s using an alias, being open and allowing Congress to view the emails will make that clear, but “given the other evidence of corruption and influence peddling, it seems obvious that the information must be reviewed.”
(post is archived)