Remember when Democrats lost the House and Nancy Pelosi announced she was no longer going to lead the Democrats, handing over leadership to New York Congressman Hakeem Jeffries? You have to remember it, Jeffries is black and that fact had Democrats and the media pleasuring themselves over how they’d selected a “historic” first. Well, it’s been a while now and you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who doesn’t think old Nancy is still in charge of Democrats in the House. That begs the question, why is she still there?
The deal was Nancy Pelosi would stick around for a little while to help the new leadership team understand how the House works – something wildly condescending, if you think about it – then she would resign. Parties can only have one leader at a time, right?
Well, it’s been seven months and Nancy shows not only no sign of resigning, she shows no sign if giving up control of the Democrat caucus in the House.
[Source.](https://www.frontpagemag.com/why-is-nancy-pelosi-still-in-congress/)
>
Remember when Democrats lost the House and Nancy Pelosi announced she was no longer going to lead the Democrats, handing over leadership to New York Congressman Hakeem Jeffries? You have to remember it, Jeffries is black and that fact had Democrats and the media pleasuring themselves over how they’d selected a “historic” first. Well, it’s been a while now and you’d be hard-pressed to find anyone who doesn’t think old Nancy is still in charge of Democrats in the House. That begs the question, why is she still there?
>
The deal was Nancy Pelosi would stick around for a little while to help the new leadership team understand how the House works – something wildly condescending, if you think about it – then she would resign. Parties can only have one leader at a time, right?
>
Well, it’s been seven months and Nancy shows not only no sign of resigning, she shows no sign if giving up control of the Democrat caucus in the House.
(post is archived)