Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

767

A law firm that submitted an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief cited by Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in her dissent in the affirmative action case filed a clarification with the Court on Friday.

As Fox News noted, the Norton Rose Fullbright firm filed a letter on Friday with the Supreme Court to clarify a study that Justice Jackson cited to claim that black babies born to black doctors have a higher survival rate.

In its clarifying letter, Norton Rose Fullbright said that “mortality” had been confused with survival rates:

[W]hile survival is the obverse of mortality and in general terms decreased mortality indicates increased survival, statistically they are not interchangeable. … A more precise summary of the study’s finding would have been to state that having a Black physician reduces by more than half the likelihood of death for Black newborns as compared to White newborns.

Much more to this in the linked article. Suffice to say Jackson got it all wrong, either purposefully to make a point, or because she's not smart enough to understand the data.

[Source.](https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/07/09/law-firm-clarifies-ketanji-brown-jacksons-controversial-claim-on-black-doctors-infant-survival/) > A law firm that submitted an amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) brief cited by Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson in her dissent in the affirmative action case filed a clarification with the Court on Friday. > As Fox News noted, the Norton Rose Fullbright firm filed a letter on Friday with the Supreme Court to clarify a study that Justice Jackson cited to claim that black babies born to black doctors have a higher survival rate. > In its clarifying letter, Norton Rose Fullbright said that “mortality” had been confused with survival rates: >> [W]hile survival is the obverse of mortality and in general terms decreased mortality indicates increased survival, statistically they are not interchangeable. … A more precise summary of the study’s finding would have been to state that having a Black physician reduces by more than half the likelihood of death for Black newborns as compared to White newborns. Much more to this in the linked article. Suffice to say Jackson got it all wrong, either purposefully to make a point, or because she's not smart enough to understand the data.

(post is archived)

[–] • 0 pt

Black doctors are killing white newborns?

[–] • 2 pts

I think the study's intention is to claim that having a nigger deliver a nigglet makes it more likely to survive, but what's probably actually happening is that nigger doctors are incompetent, especially so when delivering White babies, and just happen to put more effort into delivering nigglets, so the mortality rate of nigger-delivered nigglets is lowered, because they put more effort in for nigglets than for White babies.

That's my cynical read on what's actually happening. That said any White couple who lets a nigger deliver their baby is fucking retarded.

[–] • 1 pt

Probably to some degree, but that's not what the argument is about.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

~~"… A more precise summary of the study’s finding would have been to state that having a Black physician reduces by more than half the likelihood of death for Black newborns as compared to White newborns."

If I read that correctly it means black doctors are twice as likely to kill a white baby than a black baby?

I'll have to check the study but it sounds like the study shows nigger doctors are so inept and more likely to kill babies of certain skin color. It's instead it's cited as proof of racism instead of intent to harm white children? What the fuck~~

Edit: Yea just an awkwardly worded clarification from the law firm

[–] • 0 pt

That's not what the study authors are saying. Their claim is that a statement (such as the one by the Dindu Justice) that "decreased mortality" is the same as "increased survival" is untrue. "Statistically they are not interchangeable."

[–] • 1 pt

Yea 100% got that point. Misunderstood the clarifying statement from the firm which made the study results sound way worse.