Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

If elections were free and fair, then we would see the best Americans elected to federal, state, and local governments…usually though we don’t.

If elections were free and fair, then the least fit to govern candidates would not keep “winning” seats…but they often do.

If the elections were free and fair, then our government would not need to weaponize its agencies against its critics…but it does.

If the elections were free and fair, then our elected officials would not act in a blatant disregard of their voters’ will…but many of them do.

[Source.](https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/06/if_the_electoral_system_were_actually_free_and_fair.html) > If elections were free and fair, then we would see the best Americans elected to federal, state, and local governments…usually though we don’t. > If elections were free and fair, then the least fit to govern candidates would not keep “winning” seats…but they often do. > If the elections were free and fair, then our government would not need to weaponize its agencies against its critics…but it does. > If the elections were free and fair, then our elected officials would not act in a blatant disregard of their voters’ will…but many of them do.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 0 pt

"Democracy" is mob rule and is the easiest form of government to manipulate. Not that ((( they ))) have any trouble manipulating the current system...

[–] • 0 pt

What I'm saying is that I don't see;

White, male, Christian land-owners being the one's who vote

Is a "democracy", but I don't know a label to use here. Which is why my explanation below it. Which brings me to "limited democracy" versus "total democracy" due to lack of a label for the former. Also I'm expanding on my comment a bit.

[–] • 0 pt

What I'm saying is that I don't see;

White, male, Christian land-owners being the one's who vote

You never will, unless by some miracle an ethno-state is established somewhere outside of jewish controlled areas. And my understanding of 'democracy' as it was originally conceived is the whole 'one man, one vote' scenario where everyone participates. A 'limited democracy' is one where only certain members of society (landowners, adult males, other) have the right. We're supposed to be a republic, where we elect people to vote on issues in our stead. The system was supposed to be very small at the Federal level and was designed to be a part-time gig, not the behemoth it's become.

[–] • 0 pt

And my understanding of 'democracy' as it was originally conceived is the whole 'one man person, one vote' scenario...

Then (((democracy))) is the only reality and this has been known about for thousands of years. https://archive.md/QNylI