Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

640

If elections were free and fair, then we would see the best Americans elected to federal, state, and local governments…usually though we don’t.

If elections were free and fair, then the least fit to govern candidates would not keep “winning” seats…but they often do.

If the elections were free and fair, then our government would not need to weaponize its agencies against its critics…but it does.

If the elections were free and fair, then our elected officials would not act in a blatant disregard of their voters’ will…but many of them do.

[Source.](https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/06/if_the_electoral_system_were_actually_free_and_fair.html) > If elections were free and fair, then we would see the best Americans elected to federal, state, and local governments…usually though we don’t. > If elections were free and fair, then the least fit to govern candidates would not keep “winning” seats…but they often do. > If the elections were free and fair, then our government would not need to weaponize its agencies against its critics…but it does. > If the elections were free and fair, then our elected officials would not act in a blatant disregard of their voters’ will…but many of them do.

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (9).
[–] • 0 pt (edited )

Attacking the electoral college as a means of pushing (I don't know how to describe this)* total (((democracy))) is the exact same thing jews do in their big media names. e: I don't think that's what is meant by the title, I've further explained my point but it's real weird to explain due to the lie of "muh democracy".

'* What I mean by that is I sit on (((democracy))) while others I've talked with about this on poal and elsewhere see "demcracy" as good but perverted by jews. They then call "limited democracy" as what civilization of the past used, the idea that White, male, Christian land-owners being the one's who vote is a "democracy" and in that I disagree but I wanted to make it clear the distinction. The (((article))) is pushing for "total democracy", where everyone gets an equal vote.

ee;

Such a conclusion contradicts the voluminous evidence that our democracy, under the rule of proper constitution, created a republic that surpassed any other political system of the past; this fact is confirmed by millions of actual and prospective immigrants from around the world who recognize our country is the most desirable to live in, and subsequently, vote with their feet.

I don't like this bit. It purports that the US is a "country of immigrants", which is (((false))). We know (((who))) added the quote on the Statue of Liberty. We all also know why. With that we all also know that the US is a country of European Immigrants, as the founding fathers wrote about and legislated with the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1793 (I think that's the correct name).

[–] • 0 pt

"Democracy" is mob rule and is the easiest form of government to manipulate. Not that ((( they ))) have any trouble manipulating the current system...

[–] • 0 pt

What I'm saying is that I don't see;

White, male, Christian land-owners being the one's who vote

Is a "democracy", but I don't know a label to use here. Which is why my explanation below it. Which brings me to "limited democracy" versus "total democracy" due to lack of a label for the former. Also I'm expanding on my comment a bit.

[–] • 0 pt

What I'm saying is that I don't see;

White, male, Christian land-owners being the one's who vote

You never will, unless by some miracle an ethno-state is established somewhere outside of jewish controlled areas. And my understanding of 'democracy' as it was originally conceived is the whole 'one man, one vote' scenario where everyone participates. A 'limited democracy' is one where only certain members of society (landowners, adult males, other) have the right. We're supposed to be a republic, where we elect people to vote on issues in our stead. The system was supposed to be very small at the Federal level and was designed to be a part-time gig, not the behemoth it's become.