Why not submit the archive and put the source in the submission text?
Why not submit the archive and put the source in the submission text?
Poal creates an ugly, uninformative thumbnail for the archive link.
I'm trying out the opposite of what I used to do (Archive link above, original one below). Hence the info about the archive in the subject line.
Still a little torn, what's your opinion?
Poal creates an ugly, uninformative thumbnail for the archive link.
I'm trying out the opposite of what I used to do (Archive link above, original one below).
Hence the info about the archive in the subject line.
Still a little torn, what's your opinion?
I always archive if I don't have a reasonable screenshot to use of the page (my default is screenshot to give a bit of text but not the whole story). That way fatfinger clicking for phone posters etc. don't give referral clicks to the actual website. I dunno, it's not that big of a deal fatfingering is such a corner case.
I always archive if I don't have a reasonable screenshot to use of the page (my default is screenshot to give a bit of text but not the whole story). That way fatfinger clicking for phone posters etc. don't give referral clicks to the actual website. I dunno, it's not that big of a deal fatfingering is such a corner case.
(post is archived)