WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

470

Usually I'd say "don't trust Rolling Stone" but in this case, they certainly have leftwing sources and they're acting against their typical partisan interest. (Of course, their current partisan interest is to drive Feinstein out of the pretense of holding office so that a real c0cksvcker can be appointed to fill her seat, like Adam Schiff.)

This is grim stuff. Her handlers are basically playing Congressional Weekend at Bernie's just so they don't have to update their resumes.

> Usually I'd say "don't trust Rolling Stone" but in this case, they certainly have leftwing sources and they're acting against their typical partisan interest. (Of course, their current partisan interest is to drive Feinstein out of the pretense of holding office so that a real c0cksvcker can be appointed to fill her seat, like Adam Schiff.) > This is grim stuff. Her handlers are basically playing Congressional Weekend at Bernie's just so they don't have to update their resumes.

(post is archived)

[–] 2 pts

I would think this is most of the gov apparatus: there are the visible/public facing aspects with illusionary purposes of "your vote counts" while the majority occurs with little to no oversight. Been this way for a long long time, and is likely the mechanical aspects of the Deep State.

[–] 0 pt

...and is likely the mechanical aspects of the Deep State.

Yep. The term describes the un-elected bureaucrats who really run things and are so entrenched you can't get rid of them.