Do you truly not understand the difference and the logical conclusions / outcomes of each?
I have trouble when people online declare others as feds, simply because they purposely seek to be identified as part of a group, and when said group actively encourages and promotes self responsibility/ personal fitness, being in employment, engage in regular community works , graffitti clean ups and food drives for impoverished White families and homeless, while also dedicated to public protesting against grooming and lgbtq-p while literally advocating 'It's OK to be White'.
I mean i get it, the establishment has made it clear, anyone pro-White is racist and anyone that wears matching clothes must def be a fed, so Just stay home and vote harder .
Or do you wanna be pro-White but in a way that no-one in public sees and doesnt draw any attention ??
How many times have uniformed patriots turned out to be feds? Ray Epps ring a bell? My groups wear simular style clothes, but you ain't going to confuse one for another . It's more of a style than wear these color pants, this color shirt, this color facemask. That is the huge difference that you are trying to work around.
I'm not trying to work around anything. How else does a group easily show who they are - matching outfits.
The establishment have got you all so demoralized you're literally against uniformed group identity out in public.
Ray Epps ring a bell?
So any one wearing camo and a MAGA cap is a fed now too ?.
I guess Nordic Resistance Movement are all feds now too because they have had a uniform for males and females for public marches and protest displays ever since they formed.
(post is archived)