WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

251

Earlier this week, Donald Trump became the first former President to surrender to indictment charges brought upon him by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg.

Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, including a reported payout to former porn star Stormy Daniels. (He would plead “not guilty” to these charges before returning to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.)

Bragg insists that he conducted a “thorough investigation” into the matter before issuing the indictment order late last week. But…does it really hold any weight?

Rolling Stone published a very informative opinion piece, explaining why Bragg’s case against Trump is nothing short of a “mystery.”

After citing what we do know about the case built up against the former President, writer Ken White proclaimed, “What we don’t know – at least with the precision necessary to evaluate the case’s strengths and weaknesses – is the District Attorney’s specific legal theory of how Trump was defrauding anyone and how he was promoting or concealing a crime by doing so.”

[Source.](https://www.frontpagemag.com/braggs-empty-case/) > Earlier this week, Donald Trump became the first former President to surrender to indictment charges brought upon him by Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg. > Trump faces 34 felony counts of falsifying business records, including a reported payout to former porn star Stormy Daniels. (He would plead “not guilty” to these charges before returning to his Mar-a-Lago estate in Florida.) > Bragg insists that he conducted a “thorough investigation” into the matter before issuing the indictment order late last week. But…does it really hold any weight? > Rolling Stone published a very informative opinion piece, explaining why Bragg’s case against Trump is nothing short of a “mystery.” > After citing what we do know about the case built up against the former President, writer Ken White proclaimed, “What we don’t know – at least with the precision necessary to evaluate the case’s strengths and weaknesses – is the District Attorney’s specific legal theory of how Trump was defrauding anyone and how he was promoting or concealing a crime by doing so.”

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

I can't wait to see how this witch hunt is going to come back and grab that Affirmative Action nigger by the balls!