>Bud Light “never intended to be part of a discussion that divides people.” The only conclusion is they're idiots or being extorted by the WEF. Either scenario makes no difference. People aren't boycotting InBev, rather people don't identify with an LGBT brand and so they spend their beer budget with brands they identify with. Personally, I don't drink (((big beer))) anyway simply because it's beer flavored water. Now I have another reason not to drink InBev products, because they're marketed for mentally ill people, which I don't identify with. >this beer identifies as water LOL. Exactly. >he plans to leave Bud Light “alone” and that he wants conservatives to “do the same.” I'm leaving the entire InBev family of brands alone. I walk right by their section in the store. >Anheuser-Busch deserves a second chance because it gives money to Republican candidates and keeps its lobbying “focused on taxes and trade, things that actually impact their business.” I don't know about you, but I don't drink beer brand because of their ideology. I may refuse to buy a brand because it symbolizes something toxic to me. LBGT is very toxic right now. Seriously, people have no clue about consumer behavior anymore. All they know is to do what (((big media))) says. This debacle won't be taught in any business schools for a long time because the schools don't actually teach useful subjects anymore except "inclusion", which is really exclusion.