Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

1.2K

Texas state representative Bryan Slaton introduced a bill, on the 187th anniversary of the fall of the Alamo, to allow Texans to vote on seceding from the United States. Yes, secession, as in the pre–Civil War abandonment. Slayton said in a tweet, "After decades of continuous abuse of our rights and liberties by the federal government, it is time to let the people of Texas make their voices heard." In fact, history teaches us that there are a few ways that this movement may be successful even without secession.

I hope they are able to pull it off, but I don't think it'll be allowed to happen.

[Source.](https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/04/the_threat_of_secession_in_modern_america.html) > Texas state representative Bryan Slaton introduced a bill, on the 187th anniversary of the fall of the Alamo, to allow Texans to vote on seceding from the United States. Yes, secession, as in the pre–Civil War abandonment. Slayton said in a tweet, "After decades of continuous abuse of our rights and liberties by the federal government, it is time to let the people of Texas make their voices heard." In fact, history teaches us that there are a few ways that this movement may be successful even without secession. I hope they are able to pull it off, but I don't think it'll be allowed to happen.

(post is archived)

[–] • 2 pts

I don't think it will happen in the near term but as things like sanctuary states/counties for the 2A heat up, and even things like the Texas Suppressor Bill go forward, we could see more serious interest in secession grow over time. I think if anywhere could gain enough public support behind it it's in Texas. Even just spreading awareness that the Civil War narrative is a lie helps, not everyone dismisses the idea outright.

[–] • 1 pt

I like how the left is all pissed off that people are leaving the states because of taxes and regulations. Hey! You can't do that! We need your tax dollars to buy votes from niggers with handouts!

[–] • 0 pt

This entire line of thinking is a Jew psyop. It's culling an animal from the heard. It's to pretend it's useful. Should idiots be dumb enough to do it, they would instantly destroy the states which did it. Jews and their shills absolutely love this stupid fucking idea.

Many shills here have commonly pushed this notion - hard.

[–] • 1 pt

This entire line of thinking is a Jew psyop. It's culling an animal from the heard. It's to pretend it's useful. Should idiots be dumb enough to do it, they would instantly destroy the states which did it. Jews and their shills absolutely love this stupid fucking idea.

Many shills here have commonly pushed this notion - hard.

Please elaborate.

[–] • 0 pt (edited )

There are roughly three states, maybe two, who can economically survive without federal subsidy. So for most states, it's total and complete economic death. In turn making it ideal for socialism and communism to become accepted by the people.

The few states which could do this, would quickly become treated as hostile countries and it's extremely unreasonable to not expect either military action or socioeconomic action, such as embargo. In turn making them much easier targets for destruction and prep for socialism and communism acceptance. People whine and bitch but completely ignore the that the issue isn't federal membership in any way. The core issue is and always has been corruption of government from within by Jews and their puppets. You ready for Jews to write your new nation's constitution? You'll be sucking dick and taking it up the ass by midnight.

The phrase "strength in numbers" is applicable here.

[–] • 1 pt

Oh, OK. I think I see where you're coming from. I understand that it is a massive risk. I also understand that very few (if any) states could actually pull it off. I'm not sure how hoping they manage to succeed makes someone a jew or a shill, though.