Keep the ranked choice voting, but have the last two participants enter into a duel to the death.
This would both be term limiting and prevent infirm leadership.
Keep the ranked choice voting, but have the last two participants enter into a duel to the death.
This would both be term limiting and prevent infirm leadership.
Can somebody explain to me the exploit in ranked choice voting? I'm not seeing a real issue beyond the likelihood that multiple parties now have a chance to defeat the two party system and that means a change in how political donations will really pan out.
I saw a good breakdown a while back. Let me find it.
Edit: There are a few more recent takes, but that's the one I had bookmarked.
(post is archived)