He's a WeF stooge.
He's a WeF stooge.
Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy is the newest candidate running for the Republican presidential nomination. You can read about his agenda in The Wall Street Journal. It’s heavy on trendy populism, but his embrace of meritocracy and economic growth is an improvement over the dour dead-end statism of the “post-liberal” right.
But his most unique proposal, one that will probably sound enticing to many people, is a terrible one — and one that would expand state interference in speech and end up boomeranging on those it claims to protect:
>
Entrepreneur Vivek Ramaswamy is the newest candidate running for the Republican presidential nomination. You can read about his agenda in The Wall Street Journal. It’s heavy on trendy populism, but his embrace of meritocracy and economic growth is an improvement over the dour dead-end statism of the “post-liberal” right.
>
But his most unique proposal, one that will probably sound enticing to many people, is a terrible one — and one that would expand state interference in speech and end up boomeranging on those it claims to protect:
It’s almost as if shitskins with names that look like a dump of Scrabble tiles don’t understand the idea of inalienable rights.
It’s almost as if shitskins with names that look like a dump of Scrabble tiles don’t understand the idea of inalienable rights.
No, he understands them. I watched a long form interview about this and his feeling about this policy.
In short, he states that; either everyone is protected by the 1st amendment, or No one is protected by the 1st amendment.
He spells it out in a way that will make the lefts toes curl because they will have to admit that the protected class of people discriminate against everyone else and its illegal to discriminate against normies.
Once you understand what he's doing , shitskin or not, he's got a good point and a great way of making it. Now let's see if the left is dumb enough to fall for the trap.
No, he understands them. I watched a long form interview about this and his feeling about this policy.
In short, he states that; either everyone is protected by the 1st amendment, or No one is protected by the 1st amendment.
He spells it out in a way that will make the lefts toes curl because they will have to admit that the protected class of people discriminate against everyone else and its illegal to discriminate against normies.
Once you understand what he's doing , shitskin or not, he's got a good point and a great way of making it. Now let's see if the left is dumb enough to fall for the trap.
(post is archived)