>Supreme Court justices on Tuesday indicated an unwillingness to consider Big Tech companies liable if their algorithms promote extremist and dangerous content upon their servers. Good. Were they to rule against jewgle that would be bad for everyone but jewgle and the like. They can afford losing or winning this case. >The second Internet case this week, Twitter v Taamneh, will decide if social media companies are shielded from liability if they do not exercise aggressive editorial oversight of extremist content on their servers. Both of the cases in this article should be shot down. The moment the government is able to prosecute for subjective ideals is horrible. Question, who defines what's "extremist"? You know the answer and you know the repercussions.