WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.1K

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt (edited )

Supreme Court justices on Tuesday indicated an unwillingness to consider Big Tech companies liable if their algorithms promote extremist and dangerous content upon their servers.

Good. Were they to rule against jewgle that would be bad for everyone but jewgle and the like. They can afford losing or winning this case.

The second Internet case this week, Twitter v Taamneh, will decide if social media companies are shielded from liability if they do not exercise aggressive editorial oversight of extremist content on their servers.

Both of the cases in this article should be shot down. The moment the government is able to prosecute for subjective ideals is horrible.

Question, who defines what's "extremist"? You know the answer and you know the repercussions.

[–] 0 pt

These fucking kiked judges better not make any fucking retarded rulings in these cases.

but you know they will because kikes cant help being parasitical psychopathic fragile leeches. Their entire world view came close to crashing down over a frog ....

[–] 0 pt

I honestly doubt they will make any sweeping rulings in favor of liability for sites, but we'll see.

with the way big tech and media operate, any SC ruling will be useless anyways