>“The Hateful Conduct Law both compels social media networks to speak about the contours of hate speech and chills the constitutionally protected speech of social media users, without articulating a compelling governmental interest or ensuring that the law is narrowly tailored to that goal,” said Judge Carter Jr. in his ruling. That bit there explains (((strict scrutiny))) which is itself jewish and needs to be removed. Constitutionality is a binary test and the government does not get to explain in any way, however good that its' low is "narrowly tailored" or "fits a government interest" to be allowed to break the constitution.