WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

1.3K

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/02/will_vigilante_justice_replace_corrupted_criminal_justice.html

The Constitution is our pact of civilized behavior. From it we've derived a system of institutionalized justice, which we call our criminal justice system. It's intended to include checks and balances to protect defendants from biases and ensure fair adjudication of their charges. Those safeguards include the following:

  • a presumption of innocence
  • a right to due process
  • a right to legal defense
  • a right to a trial by one's peers
  • a right to trial before an impartial judge

Given our presumption of innocence, absolute justice can't be guaranteed because conviction depends on the presence of evidence. Instead, we have agreed to accept equal treatment under the law. We agree to abide by the law in exchange for a system that treats us equally and is administered by officials who swear an oath to defend our constitutional protections.

Then Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, and Merrick Garland came along as the country's top law enforcement officials and flushed it all. Under them, the application of justice has become decidedly unequal. Perfection was never possible, but now the claim of equal treatment has become laughable. The foundation of our legal system is being eaten away by government termites — whose lust for power far exceeds their wisdom to wield it.

https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2023/02/will_vigilante_justice_replace_corrupted_criminal_justice.html > The Constitution is our pact of civilized behavior. From it we've derived a system of institutionalized justice, which we call our criminal justice system. It's intended to include checks and balances to protect defendants from biases and ensure fair adjudication of their charges. Those safeguards include the following: > - a presumption of innocence - a right to due process - a right to legal defense - a right to a trial by one's peers - a right to trial before an impartial judge > Given our presumption of innocence, absolute justice can't be guaranteed because conviction depends on the presence of evidence. Instead, we have agreed to accept equal treatment under the law. We agree to abide by the law in exchange for a system that treats us equally and is administered by officials who swear an oath to defend our constitutional protections. > Then Eric Holder, Loretta Lynch, and Merrick Garland came along as the country's top law enforcement officials and flushed it all. Under them, the application of justice has become decidedly unequal. Perfection was never possible, but now the claim of equal treatment has become laughable. The foundation of our legal system is being eaten away by government termites — whose lust for power far exceeds their wisdom to wield it.

(post is archived)

[–] 1 pt

Sec. 219 When he who has the supreme executive power, neglects and abandons that charge, so that the laws already made can no longer be put in execution ... when that totally ceases, the government visibly ceases, and the people become a confused multitude, without order or connexion. Where there is no longer the administration of justice, for the securing of men’s rights, nor any remaining power within the community to direct the force, or provide for the necessities of the public, there certainly is no government left.

John Locke Second Treatise of Government (1690)

[–] 1 pt

John Locke Second Treatise of Government (1690)

I have his Complete Works collection downloaded. Great reference material. in case you don't have it already.

[–] 1 pt

Excellent reference link. Thank you. Project Gutenberg for me mostly. https://www.gutenberg.org/

I like to refer to Locke for the the long-winded explanation of the principals our government was founded upon, as well as the pass-fail criteria for when it's working, and when it's not.

[–] 0 pt

The Day of The Rope will cure the problems, forever.

[–] 0 pt

The Day of The Rope will cure the problems, forever.

Agreed, but I'm not gonna hold my breath waiting for it.

[–] 0 pt

It feels like the law is just a way for cowards to impose their will on people by convincing you the majority is against you. No judge gives sentencings based on their own judgment. They are all following guidlines. All of these people are fucking cowards that would piss themselves if they didn't have the full faith and backing of a governmental behemoth behind them. Not a single one of these lawyers or judges would dare confront a criminal as an individual.