Election results came in slowly. Laxalt took an early lead and maintained it until Saturday. The Associated Press called the race on Saturday night. 98% of the votes had been counted. Cortez Masto won with 48.8% or 487,829 votes compared to Laxalt’s 48.1% or 481,273 votes.
Cortez Masto winning the seat means that the Democrats retain control of the Senate.
There is no automatic recount law in Nevada. However, the losing candidate is allowed to demand a recount after all the votes are tallied.
If Laxalt is smart he'll demand a recount, just to delay the process further. Where's the harm?
>
Election results came in slowly. Laxalt took an early lead and maintained it until Saturday. The Associated Press called the race on Saturday night. 98% of the votes had been counted. Cortez Masto won with 48.8% or 487,829 votes compared to Laxalt’s 48.1% or 481,273 votes.
>
Cortez Masto winning the seat means that the Democrats retain control of the Senate.
>
There is no automatic recount law in Nevada. However, the losing candidate is allowed to demand a recount after all the votes are tallied.
If Laxalt is smart he'll demand a recount, just to delay the process further. Where's the harm?
(post is archived)