Isn't the whole point of whistleblower protections to ensure that someone's got the whistleblower's back?
Whoever retaliates against a whistleblower should be fired or jailed or capitally punished.
Isn't the whole point of whistleblower protections to ensure that someone's got the whistleblower's back?
Whoever retaliates against a whistleblower should be fired or jailed or capitally punished.
(post is archived)