By including it, they run the risk of tainting the predicate for the search warrant which could make evidence they collected during the raid inadmissible.
ever consider they just went there to destroy evidence and nothing else?
>By including it, they run the risk of tainting the predicate for the search warrant which could make evidence they collected during the raid inadmissible.
ever consider they just went there to destroy evidence and nothing else?
(post is archived)