The more I read about this the more I'm in agreement with it. (e: this = waving (((student loan debt))) ) The legislature is claiming that it should be paid off via taxpayers; >“Any plan to address student debt should go through the legislative process, and it should be more targeted and paid for so it doesn’t add to the deficit,” Pappas Which is jewish redistribution of wealth from Whites to nonWhites. If Biden is actually just talking about waving the (((debt))) without it being payed, by anyone: that's amazing and I'm behind that. And that's likely to be true as we can see the kvetching from "both sides" (as this article details). 1) Yes the (((debt))) should just be disappeared. 2) No one, including other tax payers should pay for this disappeared debt. 3) No, people who've already paid their (((student loans))) should not get any form of payment, tough luck, life is hard, some win some lose. 4) I'm actually slightly shocked to see the weird language being used in article A then opposite language in article B and another set of language in article C to describe this. The claim that "waving" off debt would cause more inflation is quite hilarious. It would lower inflation as it would destroy money ( (((debt))) is money) that isn't actually real but is just conjured out of thin air with (((usury))).