If he stands by the statement, he will lose less than if he recants.
Yes, and in Puritan New England it was a capital crime, though rarely enforced (by death), and never by stoning.
If it involved kids though (pedo) you could kiss your butt goodbye.
If he stands by the statement, he will lose less than if he recants.
Yes, and in Puritan New England it was a capital crime, though rarely enforced (by death), and never by stoning.
If it involved kids though (pedo) you could kiss your butt goodbye.
He's not wrong in principle. Personally, I'd like to avoid stoning the degenerates unless they decide to do their freakish perversions in the streets where kids can see them. Then I'm all for stoning them.
So we just save stones and wait for (((pride))) or an (((NAACP))) march?
Now I'm going to have to vote in THREE states! My state, Georgia, or was it Florida, where the guy said we can shoot abc peoples on sight! And now in Oklahoma, for this guy!
This task would be a lot easier if I were a democrat. I would be Use to it by now!
How does he only have 94 followers on fakebook? I think the man could use a few more. If only I knew a bunch of people that would do such a thing...
Well he is not wrong.
and?
(post is archived)