No one is a temp member, she works for the elite.
Don't ask me, ask the rest of Poal.
By now you should understand controlled opposition. The game is chess not checkers.
She's not a CFR boss, never has been, not even an underboss, she WAS an associate, and it didn't work out so well for her, only a few CFR members shared her views, and then she quit
That's the reality
So, back to her "script", what do the so called washington elites and MSM cronies have to gain here, newfag? With tulsi gabbard throwing them under the bus? Controlled oposition my ass
Yeah, the CFR is like working some job, then you quit when you are not happy and get to spill the beans against people that have the power to kill anyone that opposes them.
If she was actually against them, she'd be dead or sharing a cell with Julian Assange.
what do the so called washington elites and MSM cronies have to gain here, newfag.
It's called controlled op, this is how they heard the sheep. They give her spotlight for a reason, they want a non-White female as President.
Like I said, go ask the rest of Poal.
Get real, gabbard isn't fit for intentional evil
She lacks the fiber, she doesn't have what it takes
She hasn't a tenth of what "underboss pelosi" has in terms of viciousness, perversion and bad faith
Tulsi gabbard is a useful idiot at best, and she's unfit to be controlled opposition, nobody on the right is going to vote for her, just because she's democrat to begin with, stakes are simply too high right now to take the risk, and on top of that she's retarded like AOC when it comes to economics
Needless to mention that she has an antiwar stance, which doesn' fly with the CFR and the rest of the "establishment"
And on the left she isn't very popular, not degenerate enough https://www.refinery29.com/en-us/2019/11/8879720/why-hate-tulsi-gabbard-democratic-party-history-debate
But why is everyone coming for Gabbard’s neck? And more importantly, why now? Part of what has made her a target for the Democratic Party is her snark and disregard for her constituents. The rest is in reference to the way her talking points often play a little too well with Republicans, which weakens the Democrats as a party and gives more power to the right. Through and through, she’s proven to be a problem for Democrats. During the Obama administration, aside from her frequent visits on Fox News, she consistently criticized his foreign policy, the administration’s tactics of toppling Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, and ramped up the trash talk in 2015 going towards the elections, much to the Democratic party’s distress. And, to make matters worse, Gabbard’s voting history has often fallen more in line with Republicans rather than Democrats in key areas like immigration.
...
Reality is that she's too honest and naive for her own good, and she'll find out
Like I said, go ask the rest of Poal.
Yeah yeah... You really think I'm noob don't you?
(post is archived)