Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

841

(post is archived)

[–] • 3 pts

These stupid fucks wouldn’t know “constitutional” if it shoved an AR-15 up their asses while whistling The Battle Hymn of the Republic for an audience screaming “sic semper tyrannis.”

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Jean-Pierre assured that the executive order would not violate Hyde, and that "we follow the law here."

Looks like they don't the law either.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

The white house doesn't get to decide what constitutional means.

[–] • 2 pts (edited )

"The white house doesn't get to decide what constitutional means."

They just did.

It's called might makes right. Accept it. Internalize It. Make It Your Mantra.

Everything which you can't resist, is right. Everything which you can resist, is an obligation and duty.

Only outcomes matter, not how you obtain them. Thats the message the whitehouse and the FBI has clearly sent to the public with the last two years of rioting and lawlessness they enabled, encouraged, and funded, without consequence.

[–] • 0 pt

its basically been "we will do whatever the fuck we want and you wont do shit about it."

[–] • 0 pt

"and you wont do shit about it."

My guess is the american people will sooner or later, given what we're already seeing in europe. Must have the faggots in DC terrified at the thought.

[–] • 0 pt

The executive branch has no right, legally, determine what is or is not constitutional.

Hang the Brandon regime for treason

[–] • 0 pt

The dems have always broken the law. Usually they would get taken to court and then have to follow the law. Here they are outright declaring that they they will jot follow the law. What happens next?