I wish I could find my post about how the ruling isn't as good as people think it is. He firmly establishes into jurisprudence through SCOTUS precedent that the 2nd is limited and the weapons it allows are limited. Both of those ideas are dangerous as fuck and wrong. What could happen is some judaism that makes the AR15 eventually become an uncommon arm. Then this decision squarely does not apply to it by it's own words. (read the full opinion faggots) #**TLDR;** The decision is correct, the opinion is hilariously wrong and jewish. e; >More questions arise. Does the decision affecting guns “in common use” also apply to bans on certain guns, such as AR-15s, that are owned by millions of American gun owners? (((pjmedia))) and these kikes try and ratchet it back even further. The opinion CLEARLY states the AR15 IS INFACT an arm in common use. >Constitutional law attorney Mike Davis, head of the Article III Project, told the Adult in the Room Podcast that from now on these kinds of limitations on guns will be required to be measured by “strict scrutiny.” (((strict scrutiny))): when the government can give a completely made up lie that it benefits from infringing on a right then doing so is allowed.