why not just threaten to not fund the federal budget, why should we pay for 10% for the big guy
why not just threaten to not fund the federal budget, why should we pay for 10% for the big guy
why not just threaten to not fund the federal budget, why should we pay for 10% for the big guy
That's a rhetorical question, right?
>
why not just threaten to not fund the federal budget, why should we pay for 10% for the big guy
That's a rhetorical question, right?
(post is archived)