WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

469

The Washington Post reported Monday night that President Joe Biden is “considering declaring a national climate emergency” to “salvage his environmental agenda in the wake of stalled talks on Capitol Hill.” A few hours later, the Associated Press reported that the administration would “hold off” on the announcement as he, presumably, lays the political groundwork to move forward.

There’s no “It’s Summer” clause in the Constitution, empowering the president to ignore the will of Congress and unilaterally govern when it gets hot. The rejection of the president’s “agenda” by the lawmaking branch of government isn’t a justification for executive action, it’s the opposite. The Senate has unambiguously declined to implement Biden’s climate plan.

Though you have to marvel at the utter shamelessness of Democrats, incessantly warning that “democracy” is on the precipice of extinction, now urging the president to act like a petty dictator. It’s been less than a month since the Supreme Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency’s claim that bureaucrats could govern without Congress to regulate carbon (which is to say, the entire economy). What makes anyone believe that the president—who, incidentally, just got back from begging Saudi theocrats to pump more oil—is imbued with the power to enact a new regulatory regime or funding by fiat?

> The Washington Post reported Monday night that President Joe Biden is “considering declaring a national climate emergency” to “salvage his environmental agenda in the wake of stalled talks on Capitol Hill.” A few hours later, the Associated Press reported that the administration would “hold off” on the announcement as he, presumably, lays the political groundwork to move forward. > There’s no “It’s Summer” clause in the Constitution, empowering the president to ignore the will of Congress and unilaterally govern when it gets hot. The rejection of the president’s “agenda” by the lawmaking branch of government isn’t a justification for executive action, it’s the opposite. The Senate has unambiguously declined to implement Biden’s climate plan. > Though you have to marvel at the utter shamelessness of Democrats, incessantly warning that “democracy” is on the precipice of extinction, now urging the president to act like a petty dictator. It’s been less than a month since the Supreme Court rejected the Environmental Protection Agency’s claim that bureaucrats could govern without Congress to regulate carbon (which is to say, the entire economy). What makes anyone believe that the president—who, incidentally, just got back from begging Saudi theocrats to pump more oil—is imbued with the power to enact a new regulatory regime or funding by fiat?

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Lawless party in power and a "who cares about anything the other side does" opponents.

[–] 0 pt

Biden has no right to be in the White House, but you don't see anyone stopping him, do you?

[–] 0 pt

Yesterday was a bit hot so I declared a get a beer out of the fridge while I grill on the patio emergency. My quick action averted a larger crisis.

I should totally be president and stuff.

[–] 2 pts

I should totally be president and stuff.

Titus / StupidBird 2024

[–] 2 pts

Fuck yes! you in?

The crazy part is I'm sure we'd do a hell of a lot better than this administration, but then again our goal would not be the destruction of America.

I appreciate your support Professor. You can have the cabinet position of your choice!

[–] 1 pt

I'm in.

[–] 1 pt

You can have the cabinet position of your choice!

I always wanted to be Chief of Staff to some figurehead so I could exercise the power behind the throne.