Take a look at the posts here and tell me you're going to compare the headlines for all of them with what was actually said or linked.
I call people's headlines out frequently but not enough to get more than a small % of the whole. This is quite different. This isn't editing a (((CNN))) headline to correctly apply meaning. This is intentionally editing a quote in a 14 second video to flip the meaning COMPLETELY opposite of what was actually stated.
Dude. It's not hard to grasp at all.
Correct and incorrect. No it's not hard to watch a 14 second video clip and see what (((OP))) is doing. Yes it is hard to grasp why the fuck it's being allowed to the detriment of poal. Your sub, sure. That's a garbage precedent to set.
e; Also I'm not asking you to check EVERY headline or post for accuracy. Not at all. HOWEVER when it's brought to your attention then you do have a responsibility. Then it becomes yours to fix. I've done all the work in this instance. And if I notice it in others I would there as well.
HOWEVER when it's brought to your attention then you do have a responsibility. Then it becomes yours to fix. I've done all the work in this instance. And if I notice it in others I would there as well.
I disagree. It's my responsibility to review your comments and act according to site rules, not as your personal mod. I'm going to follow 's advice and sticky comments calling out posts that are intentional rather than deleting them.
It's my responsibility to review your comments and act according to site rules...
Which is what I'm asking.
not as your personal mod.
Which is not what I'm asking.
(post is archived)