It's intentionally dishonest, intentionally misleading, jewish clickbait. What the title quotes is completely opposite of what was stated. This is bad when jews do it. It's worse when "we" do it.
Why is this so hard to grasp? He intentionally left out the most important part of the sentence to make the sentence mean something completely different. He quite literally made an entire new sentance bringing more to the table and answer than was there.
Why is this so hard to grasp? He intentionally left out the most important part of the sentence to make the sentence mean something completely different.
Dude. It's not hard to grasp at all. I'm just not about to start monitoring the sub for edited headlines. It's enough having to repeatedly remind people to provide sources for their image posts. Take a look at the posts here and tell me you're going to compare the headlines for all of them with what was actually said or linked.
If wants to delete it, that's his prerogative.
Title is (intentionally?) misleading.
You don’t have to delete it when caught (by you or reported by someone). Just sticky the comment(s) calling it out and flair it as such.
Let users see for themselves (who is posting these).
You're more easy going than I. But that's also probably a good thing.
Take a look at the posts here and tell me you're going to compare the headlines for all of them with what was actually said or linked.
I call people's headlines out frequently but not enough to get more than a small % of the whole. This is quite different. This isn't editing a (((CNN))) headline to correctly apply meaning. This is intentionally editing a quote in a 14 second video to flip the meaning COMPLETELY opposite of what was actually stated.
Dude. It's not hard to grasp at all.
Correct and incorrect. No it's not hard to watch a 14 second video clip and see what (((OP))) is doing. Yes it is hard to grasp why the fuck it's being allowed to the detriment of poal. Your sub, sure. That's a garbage precedent to set.
e; Also I'm not asking you to check EVERY headline or post for accuracy. Not at all. HOWEVER when it's brought to your attention then you do have a responsibility. Then it becomes yours to fix. I've done all the work in this instance. And if I notice it in others I would there as well.
HOWEVER when it's brought to your attention then you do have a responsibility. Then it becomes yours to fix. I've done all the work in this instance. And if I notice it in others I would there as well.
I disagree. It's my responsibility to review your comments and act according to site rules, not as your personal mod. I'm going to follow 's advice and sticky comments calling out posts that are intentional rather than deleting them.
(post is archived)