I thought the Constitution gave president absolute authority about deciding who to let in or not let into the country. I think that's in the constitution. So this doesn't really surprise me at all. And I don't remember or not whether that policy was an absolute law passed by Congress that the president would have had to theoretically enforce because it was a law. But I do think if you look at the Constitution and I forget where it gives the president clear and absolute authority about deciding who to let into the country and who not to or in other words complete control over immigration. So this ruling doesn't really surprise me. In fact I'm surprised it really was a question at all since Biden is supposedly the president now.
Yes, good comment.
Besides, if the executive declares it an invasion and / or a threat to national security, I would think the power to deal with that would be quite broad.
Not worried about Kavanaugh 'turning.' Not yet at least.
I'm not familiar with mediarightnews.com but this looks like a weak attempt to sew division within the right against Kavanaugh. The executive determines immigration policy, be he Obama, Trump or Biden.
Everything assburp said in the first comment is correct as I remember.
The highlighted part on which you were supposed to bite is to turn against the justice in question. You understand the bigger picture. The typical peon doesn't and will be more easily swayed and steered.
Yes, the president is supposed to have unilateral say in how the border operates. Beyond that, he can also undo any EO set by any previous occupier n chief.
(post is archived)