WelcomeUser Guide
ToSPrivacyCanary
DonateBugsLicense

©2025 Poal.co

100

“I cannot support any legislation that funds or encourages laws that allow ex parte gun confiscation without legal representation, or even sometimes without prior notification to the defendant of any accusation at all,” Paul wrote in a series of tweets on Wednesday.

“I cannot support legislation that funds or encourages laws that allow gun confiscation with a standard lower than the constitutional criminal standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt,”’ he continued.

‘I cannot support legislation that funds or encourages gun confiscation predicated on anonymous accusations,” Paul added. “I also think it unwise to prohibit the appropriated funds from being used for firearms or firearms training for any school personnel.”

> “I cannot support any legislation that funds or encourages laws that allow ex parte gun confiscation without legal representation, or even sometimes without prior notification to the defendant of any accusation at all,” Paul wrote in a series of tweets on Wednesday. > “I cannot support legislation that funds or encourages laws that allow gun confiscation with a standard lower than the constitutional criminal standard of “beyond a reasonable doubt,”’ he continued. > ‘I cannot support legislation that funds or encourages gun confiscation predicated on anonymous accusations,” Paul added. “I also think it unwise to prohibit the appropriated funds from being used for firearms or firearms training for any school personnel.”

(post is archived)

[–] 0 pt

Would more amendments really help?

Amendments to the proposed legislation. Not to the Constitution.