Yes. Putting a lunatic in charge (Ninny and the Disinformation Governance Board) of issuing a fatwa on what speech we can engage in makes us have to live in the 1984 story. She's a part of the DHS, not just a 'Dear Abby' entertainment opinion column.
The article example was if Ninny declares discussing 'open borders' is not approved as it helps the foreign Mexican cartel's perceived power over the border, even if an 'open border' is a factual discussion, then no one can discuss the border. Not even conservative news can discuss forbidden topics without being accused by Ninny of helping the foreign cartel and then her issuing orders to have government punish businesses and citizens to enforce compliance with her fatwa.
Yes. Putting a lunatic in charge (Ninny and the Disinformation Governance Board) of issuing a fatwa on what speech we can engage in makes us have to live in the 1984 story. She's a part of the DHS, not just a 'Dear Abby' entertainment opinion column.
The article example was if Ninny declares discussing 'open borders' is not approved as it helps the foreign Mexican cartel's perceived power over the border, even if an 'open border' is a factual discussion, then no one can discuss the border. Not even conservative news can discuss forbidden topics without being accused by Ninny of helping the foreign cartel and then her issuing orders to have government punish businesses and citizens to enforce compliance with her fatwa.
(post is archived)