Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

300

State Government Committee Minority Chair Sharif Street (D-Philadelphia) spoke against the resolution, fearing it could end up compromising important constitutional rights.

“I have great reservations about opening up a constitutional convention and all of the challenges that could come out of that, potentially eroding many of our fundamental rights,” he said.

This is what was talking about

> State Government Committee Minority Chair Sharif Street (D-Philadelphia) spoke against the resolution, fearing it could end up compromising important constitutional rights. > “I have great reservations about opening up a constitutional convention and all of the challenges that could come out of that, potentially eroding many of our fundamental rights,” he said. This is what @BuddhasTorch was talking about [yesterday.](https://poal.co/s/TellPoal/501077)

(post is archived)

You are currently inside a comment thread.
Click here to see all the comments (12).
[–] • 0 pt

There is only one case where a Constitutional Convention would make sense. There is another big difference between the Amendment process and the Constitutional Convention process.

  • The Amendment process is run by Politicians in DC (two thirds of both Houses)
  • The Constitutional Convention process is run by State Legislatures (the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States)

So a Constitutional Convention would make sense if you are based enough to think that Washington was compromised while at the same time being naive enough to think that your state legislation is above reproach.

[–] • 0 pt

So a Constitutional Convention would make sense if you are based enough to think that Washington was compromised while at the same time being naive enough to think that your state legislation is above reproach.

How many states have signed on to the ? (Fifteen, so far. Saved you a click.) That alone tells you all you need to know about how above reproach the states are.

[–] • 0 pt

I did say "if you are naive enough to think that your state legislation is above reproach."

I am not that stupid. The entire strategy of Soros was to compromise the government at the Federal, State and local levels.

[–] • 0 pt

I am not that stupid. The entire strategy of Soros was to compromise the government at the Federal, State and local levels.

I know you're not that stupid. I was merely pointing out that states are not trustworthy.