Welcome • User Guide
ToS • Privacy • Canary
Donate • Bugs • License

©2025 Poal.co

247

Some of the RNC's complaints listed in its letter include:

  • holding the first debate after early voting had begun;
  • accusing the commission of "making unilateral changes to previously agreed-upon debate formats and conditions, in some cases without even notifying the candidates";
  • "selecting a moderator who had once worked for the Democrat nominee, a glaring conflict of interest";
  • the CPD's failure "to maintain the organization's strict nonpartisanship, with a majority of its Board Members publicly disparaging the Republican nominee."
Some of the RNC's complaints listed in its letter include: * holding the first debate after early voting had begun; * accusing the commission of "making unilateral changes to previously agreed-upon debate formats and conditions, in some cases without even notifying the candidates"; * "selecting a moderator who had once worked for the Democrat nominee, a glaring conflict of interest"; * the CPD's failure "to maintain the organization's strict nonpartisanship, with a majority of its Board Members publicly disparaging the Republican nominee."

(post is archived)

[–] [deleted] • 2 pts

Stop fucking threatening and start doing shit. This is getting old….

Not going to happen, though. It would be nice if both sides of the aisle weren’t controlled by the same (((people)))

[–] • 1 pt

Nothing they can do. They're all pawns in a captured system.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Not all of them. She’s terrible at her job, but Marjorie Green seems like she’s independent of (((them))). .

[–] • 1 pt

All politics is theater. All participants are actors, whether they realize it or not.

We have no representation in government. Just actors, rah-rahing us to fight each other instead of the system itself.

[–] • 1 pt

Fine with me. The CPD favored Dems anyway.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

I don't know anyone that watches this shitshow.

[–] • 1 pt

"Debates" are not debates, they are only two people trying to give speeches at once.

Just have someone post a set of questions and each side can make a video answering each question however they want. The idea that both need to take the same amount of time on the same stage for each question is stupid in today's world.

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt (edited )

Seems like the early primary debates are designed to make the weakest Republican candidate the nominee. Which is how we wound up with Trump, because he worked that "Jerry Springer" angle so well. He still turned out to be a stronger candidate than Shillary though, because she was anointed by her party even though she was a very weak candidate, being a lifelong political hack with no real core of personality. Trump says whatever's on his mind even if it's stupid, but Shillary only says things that she believes the people she's with at the moment want to hear her say at the moment.

What Americans really want is someone with principles who stands by them. I don't even think his principles need to be in alignment with theirs, as long as he has ones that you can define. Maybe that's what really got Adolph into power, he said what he really believed when he spoke to the People.

[–] • 0 pt

Who did you prefer over Trump?

[–] [deleted] • 1 pt

Rand Paul. He ran in the 2016 Primary.